Resources
|
Academics
|
Life@Harvard
|
Life@Cambridge/Boston
|
|
| Home > Academics > Departmental Evaluations | |
Departmental Evaluations |
|
|
On this Page: Step One: Annual Review Step Two: Warnings and Terminations |
|
Step One: Annual Review In May, departments are asked to evaluate the progress of each of their graduate students for the purpose of determining eligibility for financial aid for the following academic year. Some students may be given warning of academic goals or timetables that they will be expected to meet in the coming year. Each spring, directors of graduate studies will receive a list of those students in their departments who are carrying Incomplete courses. Departments are asked to take this information into consideration when making decisions on satisfactory progress. A department may give a student a year of "grace" to regain satisfactory status. The year-end review is also a time for departments to consider any students who may be affected by the G-10 rule. When returning satisfactory progress rosters, departments should point out to the Administrative Dean any students for whom they feel an exception to the rule should be made. Step Two: Warnings and Terminations |
|
| Home > Academics > Departmental Evaluations | |
Resources
|
Academics
|
Life@Harvard
|
Life@Cambridge/Boston
|
|
| Updated August 1, 2001. |