Where is Mental Health?

| October 21, 2011 | 7 Comments

By Adam Joseph
Global Mental Health Columnist

This first segment of a two-part series focuses on the absence of mental health as a significant priority on the global health stage.

Unlike the more visible problems of HIV, malnutrition, or maternal and child health, mental health has not attained a heightened sense of urgency on the global health stage. The World Health Organization (WHO) recently released a media report that highlights the underinvestment in mental health care in developing nations. The findings are disturbing: in low income countries, the average spending for mental health care can be as little as $0.25 per person per year.[1]

 

Image courtesy of the WHO.

Why has global mental health been unable to leverage substantial foreign aid movements, when it is clearly a problem that is destructive to developing nations?  Perhaps the most important reason that explains the lack of support is the ubiquitous stigma of mental illness, as well as the absence of a unifying advocate for mental health.

National Public Radio recently released a story highlighting the stigma associated with mental illness in India. Women in India are often afraid of pursuing treatment in mental health because of the “dishonor” it would bring to their families, which would greatly reduce their chances of getting married.Therefore, elements of India’s social structure have contributed to the taboo of mental health in the nation, resulting in inadequate psychiatric care.[2]

Given that treatment of mental health is so highly stigmatized in communities worldwide, the major funders to global health initiatives do not group mental health with other significant priorities.  The UN chose to exclude mental health from the Millennium Development Goals, a fact that has been hotly contested by advocates.[3],[4] In low to middle income countries, over three-quarters of the mentally ill receive no care at all. Despite this, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation choose not to focus its efforts on research in mental health because of “other efforts” already being made in the field.[5] Perhaps this stems from the inability to present mental illness in the same way that a malnourished child from Sudan or a balding young mother with breast cancer can be presented. Mental illness is simply not “photogenic” enough.

Even in fully developed countries, there exists a particular repulsion from mental illness. When a person develops cancer in the U.S., there is a strong public support structure that encourages them to obtain care. However, when someone has bipolar disorder or an anxiety disorder, seeing a psychiatrist becomes largely a private matter that, if made public, marginalizes and alienates the person from others. Simply put, stigma cannot be eliminated from the third world when developed nations cannot provide a model for other nations to follow.

In addition to such marginalization, the current dearth of celebrities advocating global mental health compounds the neglect of this issue.  Other global health initiatives, such as HIV and cancer, have celebrities who actively advocate for awareness of such illnesses. For example, NBA star Earvin “Magic” Johnson, who announced being HIV-positive in 1991, was essential to raising awareness for HIV. Similarly, Lance Armstrong was diagnosed with testicular cancer and started the Livestrong campaign, which has raised over $400 million for cancer to date.[6] Countless Americans proudly display the popular “Susan G. Komen For the Cure” pink ribbon on their car bumpers.

Images Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

Mental illness lacks this unifying figure. When a celebrity comes out as having issues with their mental health, perhaps with alcoholism, they are immediately type-casted as another celebrity who let fame and money get to their head.

There exists a legend that, in the late 18th century, French physician Philippe Pinel entered a lunatic asylum in Paris and majestically freed the insane from the chains that bound them. Now, more than ever, we need a “Pinel” to unchain the shackles of stigma from those with mental illnesses. Only then will we be able to initiate a truly meaningful global mental health finance effort that can confront the tragedies of mental illness.

 


[1] World Health Organization. Media Centre.  “WHO highlights global underinvestment in mental health care.”  Switzerland:  WHO, 2011. < http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/notes/2011/mental_health_20111007/en/index.html>. 16 Oct 2011.

[2] Kennedy, Miranda.  “In India Stigma of Mental Illness Hinders Treatment” National Public Radio.  11 Aug 2011. < http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=129091680 > 16 Oct 2011

[3] United Nations. Millennium Development Goals Report 2011.  New York:  United Nations, 2011. < http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/11_MDG%20Report_EN.pdf> 18 Oct 2011

[4] Silberner, Joanne.  “Mental Health Not Getting Enough Attention From UN.”  PRI’s the World.  19 Sept 2011. <http://www.theworld.org/2011/09/mental-health-not-getting-enough-attention-from-un/> 16 Oct 2011

[5] Gates Foundation. Global Health Strategy Overview. Seattle: Gates Foundation, 2010. <http://www.gatesfoundation.org/global-health/Documents/global-health-strategy-overview.pdf> 18 Oct 2011

[6] Lance Armstrong Foundation. “LiveStrong Information.”  Austin:  Lance Armstrong Foundation, 2011. <http://mediaroom.livestrong.org/easyir/msc2.do?easyirid=0E930790BB25ECB9>. 18 Oct 2011.

[7] World Health Organization. Department of Knowledge Management and Sharing. “Image of a person with mental disorder.”  Switzerland:  WHO, 2010. < http://www.globalmentalhealth.org/gallery.php>

Tags: , , , , ,

Category: Global Mental Health, Online Columns

About the Author ()

Adam Joseph is a freshman at Harvard College. Adam is interested in global health (of course), but also takes a particular interest in mental health and psychiatry. In his free time, he enjoys golfing and skiing, doing research, and spending time with his friends. Adam is currently an online columnist for the Harvard College Global Health Review, covering Global Mental Health.

Comments (7)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Roos Korste says:

    Thanks Adam Joseph for addressing this matter so clear. Mental health not being one of the Millennium Development Goals, and not in the list of the Non Communicable Diseases either, is very disappointing. I think the global mental health field is not catching up enough with developments in global education, funding and marketing. A bit too much ‘the old way’, the old networks and academic pathways. I like the way mental health advocacy organizations for example in the UK and Australia are fighting stigma with multimedia campaigns and a lot of user involvement. I’m sure there is a lot of potential worldwide in service users, family members and mental health care providers to link hands and campaign for more attention and funding for mental health. I visited, for example, the Cape Mental Health Foundation Kite festival recently near Cape Town, South Africa, and that is just one example of a well organized mental health awareness event. But global umbrella organizations like the World Mental Health Federation and the Movement for Global Mental Health seem still not ‘Cyber or Street’ ready. What do you think?

  2. Andre Barkil says:

    Great article! I wanted to add that Pinel’s story is not
    A legend, it is historical facts documented by many writers of that era. For more
    Contemporary descriptiom see “the roots of recovery movement in psychiatry” by Larry Davidson
    For full description of Pinel’s role in the asylum.
    Also, I totally agree that NGOs have been shying away
    From mental health issues, fortunately the trend is slowly changing with big player organizations like PIH and MSF who started stand alone
    Mental health programs

  3. Adam Joseph says:

    To Andre-
    Perhaps I was a bit unclear about Pinel’s story. Yes, Pinel was a historical figure who had a story that was documented by many writers. However, it may be interesting to consider the “Pinel Myth”- the idea that the story was perhaps romanticized overtime. This was a topic of discussion during a course I recently took called “Madness and Medicine” taught by Professor Anne Harrington. Her main take-home point about Pinel’s story was that it was a “little more complicated”. However, that said, I do not mean to dismiss his contributions to psychiatry and to mental health.

Leave a Reply