|
Muslims
in European Schools
New York Times Editorial
October 8, 2003
The question of whether
Muslim women can wear head scarves in European state schools keeps
coming back. A French school recently suspended two girls for
covering their heads, while Germany ruled in favor of a teacher
who insisted on wearing her head scarf in class. Cases like the
one in France have been portrayed as a defense of the secular
state — the need to keep overt religious symbols out of
state schools. This seems a false pretext. Following the dress
or dietary codes of one's faith is an exercise of freedom of conscience
so long as the exercise does not amount to proselytizing or otherwise
infringing on the freedoms of others.
The laws, their rationale
and their enforcement differ from country to country, even school
to school. But the fact is that any such regulation is inherently
discriminatory because the targets are likely to be members of
faiths that mandate outward signs. The scarf of a Muslim woman,
the skullcap of an observant Jew and the turban of a Sikh cannot
be concealed.
In France, Europe's
most adamantly secular nation, the constitution gives schools
power to ban any religious symbol worn as an "act of pressure,
provocation, proselytism or propaganda." But that provision
was framed in a long and bitter struggle between church and state.
The real motive behind the objections to head scarves too often
appears to be resentment of the growing population of Muslims,
sometimes augmented by feminists who see the scarf as a symbol
of women's subjugation.
These are not valid
motives. The purpose of separating church and state in schools
is to liberate students from the pressures and taboos of sectarians
and ideologues. Of course, wearing a head scarf may well be a
political statement, and it may even inspire schoolmates to explore
radical Islam. But to presume that every devout Muslim is a radical
is a false and dangerous notion. And the battle with extremism
cannot start with the suppression of personal religious expression
in schools; that is not only a violation of fundamental freedoms,
but also a good way of pushing ideas underground and ensuring
that they become seriously dangerous.
|