Fellow Celts, JurismathematicoCelt Tom Brennan (tbrennan@math.harvard.edu) has provided us with this fascinating piece of scientific inquiry: Attend! Some Properties of the Celt-space To begin with, we must note that the Celt-space is not Hausdorff. That is to say, given two points of the Celt-space it is not in general possible to separate them, as elements of the space, using the open sets of the topology. The points in the Celt-space are, of course, the Celts (the nature of the Celts will be described more fully below), and the fact that the Space lacks the Hausdorff property is simply a reflection of the fact that the Celt-space operates to unifty Celts. Because the Hausdorff property fails, many of our usual intuitions about topological spaces may not give us proper guidance in this realm, and so we should be careful about the assumptions we make. The next comment that needs to be made about the Celt-space relates to the limited manner in which we are able to make observations of it, and thereby to get information about its overall structure. You see, the Celt-space intersects our physical world (spacetime or what have you), but it is not contained within it. When observing the Celt-space in our world, we thus see only a cross-section of the Space and we see it only as it moves through the physical world. (Cf. the concept of the world sheet in physics: the path etched out by a superstring as it moves through a multidimensional model of spacetime.) We are therefore limited in how fully we are able to describe the overall structure of the Celt Space, and some aspects of it will necessarily remain a mystery. The points of the Celt-space are known as the Celts. The relationship between these Celts and the Celts of common parlance deserves to be explicated briefly. Each Celt, in the everyday sense, is the intersection with our world of a subset of points in the Celt-space which are identified under a certain natural equivalence relation on the Space. Thus, wherever there is a Celt (in the everyday sense) in our world, there is a point of intersection between our world and the Celt-space. When the meaning is clear from context, we will sometimes refer alternatively to Celts as being either the individual points of the Celt-space or as being the equivalence classes just described. The Celt-space is topologically connected, however its intersections with our world frequently have many connected components. Often, each connected component may not have overlap with more than one Celt (in the equivalence class sense). However, at times of Celtic Nexus, such a connected component has overlap with multiple Celts. At a Celtic Nexus, it has been observed that the fundamental group of the space resulting from the local intersection is always finite and cyclic. In fact, its order is equal to the number of (equivalence classes) of Celts present at the Nexus, and the cyclic nature of the group is manifested in the Wheel of Celticity present at every such Nexus. Also interesting is the fact that each local intersection of this sort results in an orientable space, as is manifested by the fact that the Wheel of Celticity has a naturally preferred clockwise orientation. The final result of this note pertains to the fundamental group of the entire Celt-space: it is isomorphic to S^1, the circle group. There are at least two important things to say about this. First, this is a further manifestation of the Wheel of Celticity. In fact, it is believed that there is a Universal Wheel of Celticity accompanying this circle group and that the Wheel of Celticity present at each Celtic Nexus is simply the intersection of this Universal Wheel with our world at the point of the Nexus. Second, the fact that the fundamental group has infintely many generators means that the Celt-space is not embeddable in any finite dimensional space. Thus not only has the Celt-space never been known to be contained completely within our physical world, but it is in fact not possible for it to do so (in any finite dimensional model of our world). With further research, more results are undoubtedly obtainable along these lines. The best method, at the moment, for deducing results about the Celt-space at large, seems to be to understand it first locally (in the Celtic Nexi) and then extrapolate from there. It is believed that techniques in this direction should enable one eventually to understand not only the fundamental group, as described herein, but also the higher homotopy groups of the space. In another direction, more creative techniques need to be developed to understand the nature of the equivalence relation, mentioned above, which exists naturally on the Celt-space. For now though, these and other findings must await future study. -- Tom Brennan, Badass