How
Many Letters Do I Need?
Most law schools ask for two letters of recommendation. Academic
letters are preferred. If you are an alumna/us, you should still include
at least one academic letter in your application (many alumni/ae ask
their managers or coworkers to write the other letter -- see our section
on special considerations for alumni/ae
applicants).
Students often ask
if it is OK to send three letters. The answer is yes -- but only sometimes.
Do not send essentially duplicative letters. But if you can get a good
letter from someone who knows you from a completely different perspective
-- a coach, for example, or a former employer -- then it may be worth
submitting three letters. Don't forget that letters of recommendation
are out of your control. You don't know for sure what you're submitting.
The best you can do is guess from your relationship with your recommenders.
Thus the risk associated with sending three letters: two great letters
are always better than two great letters and a lukewarm letter.
The fact that you
will send two letters does not mean, however, that you should
only ask for two letters. If you are fortunate enough to know
several great recommenders, consider asking all of them to write
you a letter. That way you will have the letters available to use, when
and if you decide to use them. Dunster House will keep the letters in
your House file essentially forever. You can decide later which letters
you will actually send to law schools, but you can only pick from the
letters that are in your file. The wider the selection you have available
at that time, the better! Of course, you should not ask someone to write
you a letter if there is no realistic chance that you will use it. But
it is perfectly acceptable (and a pretty good strategy) to ask 3-4 plausible
recommenders for letters and defer the choice over which to use until
later. Think of it as insurance in case one of them doesn't work out,
or in case you change your mind about how you want to position yourself
in your application, or in case you decide to defer applying to law
school for a year or longer. As a general rule, more letters in your
file = better.
Whom
Should I Ask?
First of all, as we've already noted, you should prefer academic recommenders
over non-academic recommenders. Law schools want to know about your
ability to thrive in an intense academic environment, and they consequently
tend to give more weight to academic letters.
Second, you
should prefer people who know you well over people who are famous
or important. Obviously, if a famous professor also happens to
know you well, that's great. But if not, ask a TF or tutor instead.
Law schools are not particularly impressed by name-dropping. Send
them letters from people who can really describe your work, rather
than people who can confirm that you were in their class, or that
they gave you an A. The best recommendations typically come from
people who can go beyond vague platitudes and offer anecdotal
evidence of your superior intelligence, skill, personal character,
insight, writing ability, or whatever.
However, some law schools (Harvard Law, for example) do express a
distinct preference for letters from professors. A good way to
satisfy this preference while still getting a more personal letter
would be to ask the professor if he or she would be willing to
co-sign a letter written by a TF for one of his/her classes. Also,
check to see if individual schools will accept more then the
required number of recommendation letters - if they do, this might
be a way to have both the weight of a professor's letter and the
familiarity of a TF's letter both be represented.
What
Should the Letters Emphasize?
If your recommender seems amenable to suggestions regarding your letter,
consider suggesting that he/she emphasize your analytical skills, leadership
ability, ability to "get underneath" the readings, etc. Terms
like "analytical skill" can be interpreted broadly -- just
about any strong academic work exhibits analytical skills of some kind.
The point is simply that law schools believe that legal work is unusually
analytical, and consequently they're looking for candidates with strong
"analytical skills." It's a good theme to emphasize if you
have the chance.
Should
Letters be Specific to Law School? Your
letters should be specific to law school (i.e., they should explicitly
address your qualifications for attending law school). However, they
do not need to be addressed to specific schools. Most letters use a
general phrase like "Dear Law School Admissions Committee"
or "To the Members of the Admissions Committee." Law schools
expect this kind of formulation.
That said, if you
have a letter in your file that you want to use and you cannot contact
the recommender to ask him/her to revise it, don't worry too much about
it. Dunster students in the past have successfully used letters written
for fellowship purposes, etc. But if you can, it is always better to
ask previous recommenders to revise their letters for law school purposes.
The Resident Dean's Assistant
in the Dunster House Office will gladly forward a copy of your letter
back to your recommender if they lost or misplaced the original.
How
to Ask for Letters of Recommendation.
First of all, we suggest that you ask your recommender in person
to write a letter for you -- just make an appointment to see her or
drop by during her office hours. Asking in person gives your
recommender a chance to chat with you about your current goals, and
to refresh her memory about you as a person. Approaching the
recommender directly also gives her a chance to refuse you. (If the
recommender is too busy or feels that she cannot write a strong
recommendation for some other reason, it is better to know in
advance.) For this reason, be sure to present your request in a way
that gives your recommender a gracious way to refuse: e.g., "I know
you are really busy these days, but would you consider writing a
letter of recommendation for me for law school?" And don't take
offense if a professor or a TF says no -- they're actually doing you
a favor by admitting that they don't have the time or inclination to
write a sufficiently enthusiastic and detailed letter. It is better
that they say no than that they write and submit a mediocre letter.
Second, ask early. The earlier the better! Professors and TFs often
get overwhelmed with requests for letters of recommendation at the
height of the law school application season (which coincides with the
fellowship season, etc.). Every year, a few students' applications
are delayed because they waited too long to ask for letters of
recommendation. Don't let this happen to you!
Third, remember to give the recommender everything he/she needs. This
includes at least the following:
- A signed and completed LOR Form from the LSAC website (see the instructions).
- A stamped envelope, addressed to the LSAC.
- A stamped envelope, addressed to the House Office (see below).
- A packet of other helpful information -- e.g., your resume, a copy of the A paper you wrote for his/her class, a short paragraph describing why you are applying to law school, etc.
Should
I Waive My Right of Access?
Under federal law, you have the right to access your academic
records, including any letters of recommendation, in your House file.
This right, like most rights, is susceptible to knowing and voluntary
waiver. As you know, most law schools provide a "Recommendation Form"
or similar document that asks whether you will waive your right to
access your law school recommendations. The House Waiver Form asks
the same question. This is exceedingly common -- you saw something
similar when you applied to Harvard, for example.
So should you waive your right of access? (Most people do.) In our
view, the answer should depend (1) on how much you want to see the
letter in question, and (2) on how likely you think it is that law
schools will care that you did not waive your rights. Why might they
care? The concern is that your recommender may have pulled his/her
punches in the knowledge that you would later see the letter and might
ask about it. Put differently, the concern is that recommenders will be
less honest if you don't waive your rights. That's ultimately an
empirical question, and lacking any real evidence either way, we're
each left simply to intuit the answer. Our advice is that you should
err on the side of caution and waive your rights unless you feel
particularly strongly about the issue (some students do) or
particularly hesitant to waive with regard to a certain recommender
(this sometimes happens). In general, though, you should waive it.
Where
Should My Recommender Send His/Her Letter?
Your recommender shouldn't have to worry about the address, since you
should have given him/her a stamped and addressed envelope! We also
recommend having your recommender send a copy of their letter to the
House office (see this document for more information),
so you should also provide him/her with a stampled envelope addressed
to the Dunster House Office:
Office of
the Senior Tutor
Dunster House
Harvard University
Cambridge, MA 02138-7523
Do not have your
letter sent straight to law schools unless you have no choice (i.e.,
because you waited too long).
How
Do I Know When Letters Have Arrived at Dunster House?
When a letter of recommendation arrives in the House office, folks in the House office
updates the website to reflect it. So, you'll be able to see in your
file on Mooselaw that your recommender has sent his/her letter out.
They can also let you know how many letters you have in your file if
you've had them sent to the House previously. It is your
responsibility to keep in touch with the House office and with your recommenders
to make sure that your letters arrive in time for your applications.
Click here to read more about the House office's role in the law school
application process.
Can
My Tutor Help Me Pick Which Letters to Send?
Unfortunately, no. You must choose which letters you wish to have
sent to law schools. Stringent University guidelines on
confidentiality prohibit pre-law tutors from guiding you in your
choice of confidential letters -- i.e., those to which you have
waived your right of access.