|
~This
Issue's Index~
Is
it Real?
A
Look at Japan's Internet Venture Boom
By
Hironubu Tamaki
The Internet venture business
is booming in Japan. Not a single day passes without
reports in the mass media about venture businesses:
"Liquid Audio Japan goes public. The capitalization
of the company, which had no revenue a year ago, has
surpassed 50 billion yen"; "Internet Research
Institute's capitalization has surpassed 1 trillion
yen"; "Softbank raises a 150 billion yen venture
fund."; "Japan has caught up with Silicon
Valley." Is this boom real or is it the stuff of
dreams?
Forces
behind the Boom
The answer
to this questions lies in some of the important factors
that brought Japan to where it is now. Since the beginning
of the recession in the early 1990s, the myth of the
almighty giant Japanese corporation has been collapsing.
Yamaichi Securities' bankruptcy in November 1997 was
a symbolic event. The number of new hires from universities
decreased, and students also started to question the
stability of large corporations. Before the recession,
working for a bank was considered a guarantee of lifetime
employment security. Now, if one takes a job with a
bank, relatives will ask, "Are you sure you really
want to do this?" At the same time, commercial
use of the Internet started in 1994, and the success
stories of Internet ventures such as Netscape and Yahoo!
drew the attention of bright graduates.
One unexpected
factor that has also contributed to the current Internet
venture boom is the unique career path of management
consultants. In the US, consultants from prestigious
firms such as Boston Consulting Group and McKinsey &
Company become management executives at major companies.
One prominent example is ex-McKinsey consultant Louis
V. Gerstner, now CEO of IBM. At major Japanese corporations,
however, almost all management talent is promoted from
within. Consultants in their mid-30s are forced to make
a choice between being a consultant for life or starting
their own company. For these consultants, starting a
new venture appears to be a very attractive option.
Mr. Mikitani from Rakuten, the most popular online shopping
mall, Ms. Namba from DeNA, a popular online auction
site, and Mr. Sasaki from Auto-By-Tel, were all consultants.
There are even more former consultants at non-CEO levels
of management.
The low interest
rate policy of the Bank of Japan and the booming US
economy have also pushed the venture boom ahead. Former
Prime Minister Obuchi aggressively promoted a low-interest
rate policy as a means of ending the worst domestic
recession since World War II. Accordingly, the Bank
of Japan's official interest rate was lowered to 0.5%
in 1995. Equity became a more viable financing option
as institutional and individual investors shifted assets
to riskier investment vehicles. Life insurance companies,
which had not been allowed to invest in risky assets,
recently started investing in private equity. US funds
have also flowed into Japan from other areas.
The red-hot
US economy and huge fund inflows to Silicon Valley led
to absurdly high valuations of venture firms. As venture
funds achieved astronomical returns, buyout funds such
as Kohlberg, Kravis, Roberts & Co. entered the venture
business field, unable to resist investors pressure
to do so. Once too much money was chasing too few deals,
excess capital started flowing into Europe and Asia.
The rise in valuation in these areas is evidence of
this trend.
Japanese
firms, Softbank and Hikari Tsushin, have played major
roles in venture investment. Backed by the high stock
prices of its portfolio companies, which included NASDAQ
companies such as Yahoo! and E*Trade, Softbank formed
venture funds and started investing in domestic Internet
ventures. The amount raised or announced by Hikari Tsushin
and Softbank combined totaled approximately US $3 billion.
Their investment strategies are typical of portfolio
investment. Though each individual company may not be
a diamond, as the sector grows, investments will certainly
generate good returns.
It is worth
noting that Softbank has put together a complete value-chain
of components necessary for venture business incubation.
Softbank Internet Funds provide seed money; Softbank
Technology Corp. builds e-commerce systems; Pasona Softbank
dispatches engineers and people with necessary skills
to venture firms; Softbank Investment Corp. advises
them on how to go public; E*Trade Japan underwrites
public offerings and bond issuances; NASDAQ Japan offers
an exchange for venture firms; the Nippon Credit Bank
provides loans to venture businesses; and so forth.
This means that if the seed of a business is especially
promising, Softbank can certainly take it public.
As a competitor
to NASDAQ Japan, the Tokyo Stock Exchange created MOTHERS,
a new stock exchange for high-growth companies. The
name is an acronym for Market Of The High-Growth and
EmeRging Stocks, and also implies that the market will
incubate Japanese ventures as a mother would nurture
a child. Its requirements for listing are very loose
compared to its predecessors or even NASDAQ Japan, which
applies practically the same listing and delisting requirements
as NASDAQ. A venture firm can go public in MOTHERS simply
if a security firm decides to underwrite the IPO.
The emergence
of MOTHERS and NASDAQ Japan opened an exit route for
venture capital. Before the creation of MOTHERS or NASDAQ
Japan, it commonly took more than 20 years for a Japanese
corporation to go public. By definition, a 20-year-old
company is no longer a venture company and would not
have much need for fresh capital. Since the standard
life of a venture fund is ten years, it was practically
impossible for the public to invest in a Japanese venture
business at the seed stage. Now that the average time
required to go public has been shortened significantly,
many foreign venture funds have started investing in
Japan. Suddenly, capital supply exceeds demand, and
company valuations have skyrocketed. Now, the supply-demand
situation of capital has become very similar to that
in Silicon Valley.
Bit Valley
A symbolic
event for the recipients of venture capital was the
birth of Bit Valley, which was proposed and initiated
by Mr. Koike, the CEO of Net Year. Bit Valley is one
of many places around the world echoing Silicon Valley,
though the name Bit Valley is derived from the English
translation of Shibuya, where many venture businesses
reside. Though the direct translation is Bitter Valley,
the name was modified to eliminate the negative tone
and allude to the Information Technology industry. Between
500 to 1,000 Internet venture firms currently reside
in the 5 x 10 km area along Yamate St., a little west
of Shibuya.
These businesses,
however, do not resemble Cisco or Sun Microsystems at
their inception. At a quick glance, most of these start-ups
provide Web-hosting, Web-building, or content production
services only-the types of work which large corporations
typically outsource. Almost no company is built around
unique technologies that can differentiate it from its
competitors. Research on 43 Bit Valley venture firms
revealed that approximately 80% of them were founded
by people with no science or engineering degrees. This
is completely different from Silicon Valley, where most
ventures are started by engineers.
This difference
is not because of a lack of good engineers in Japan,
but simply because talented engineers still gravitate
towards working in laboratories at universities or in
large corporations. There is a shortage of talented
engineers with business skills, unlike in Silicon Valley,
where there are many. Quite a few Japanese engineers
do not understand simple financial statements. In the
past, Japanese seemed to be more risk-averse than the
Americans or the Chinese, and this outlook still holds
true for Japanese engineers. Nevertheless, there are
significant chances that these service-oriented venture
businesses will flourish. One typical example is Rakuten,
an online shopping mall, founded and run by Hiroshi
Mikitani, a Harvard MBA, which has achieved relative
success.
Management
talent is also scarce. When Jerry Yang founded Yahoo!
he was still a Stanford student and was not confident
about managing his new company. Yang thus decided to
seek outside help by hiring Tim Koogle as CEO. His strategy
worked, and Yahoo! became a great success.
Management
is different in Japan. It is a norm for students graduating
from prestigious universities to go straight into major
corporations. The lifetime employment system protects
them, and they tend to remain loyal to one company.
Therefore, turnover of managerial talent is almost non-existent.
And even though senior managers occasionally become
available for reasons such as bankruptcy, their management
styles are deeply rooted in one specific corporate culture
and are sometimes not transplantable to other corporations?especially
venture businesses.
Internet
Businesses by Large Corporations
In the United
States, venture firms played a significant role in creating
Internet businesses in the early days. In the business-to-consumer
arena, for example, the premier group includes America
Online in consumer on-line services, Yahoo! as a portal
site, Amazon in e-commerce, and E-Bay in on-line auctioning.
In Japan, their equivalents are Sony's So-net, NEC's
ISP Biglobe, Softbank's Yahoo! Japan, Sumitomo's Lycos,
Kinokuniya's Kinokuniya Online, and Seven Eleven Japan's
Seven Dreams. Only in the on-line auction arena is the
lead being taken by venture firms, such as Rakuten and
DeNA. Large Japanese corporations clearly learned from
the mistakes of their US counterparts and entered the
field of Internet business at a much earlier stage.
The Road
Ahead
If the ultimate
goal in starting a business is to make fortune, then
this is great time to start one. A share of IRI, the
first company listed on MOTHERS, was once traded at
a multiple of 2,400 times sales. Even though Liquid
Audio Japan had almost no sales at the time of its IPO,
its market capitalization once exceeded 50 billion yen.
Given the fact that corporations are growing concerned,
however, the outlook for Japanese venture businesses
is not very promising, for all the reasons discussed
above.
Can Japan's
situation be improved? There are several issues that
must be addressed. Japan's educational system must be
overhauled to encourage creativity. Entrepreneurship,
including company structuring, fund raising, and developing
new technologies, must be taught at graduate business
schools. It is also essential to teach engineers business
fundamentals so that they understand the risk and returns
involved in starting a venture business. Since the returns
from the stock market are quite lucrative, there is
no question that they would leave large corporations
once they understood how to start their own venture
businesses. In addition, Japan needs to develop a pool
of talented managers. Like engineers, they may be lured
by the monetary reward, but what matters is the adaptability
of their skills. There are no easy solutions to the
problem, though many hope that urgent needs for economic
growth will shake up the traditional culture of corporate
Japan. Looking back over Japan's economic history, growth
has come from many sources, such as low labor costs,
inexpensive materials, improvement in production efficiency,
and entrance into other markets. Because all these assets
have been fully exploited, Japan needs another source
of growth?real Internet entrepreneurship.
~This
Issue's Index~
|