Even though he was a September call-up and World Series hero last year, he still qualifies as a rookie under the major league rules since he has had fewer than 130 at-bats in the majors. Unfortunately for Mr. Ellsbury, alongside him in centerfield this spring training will be the incumbent Coco Crisp, who the Red Sox have signed through the end of 2009, with an option for 2010. Crisp’s name was heard in trade rumors involving Johan Santana all winter, but since Santana was shipped to the Mets for a bunch of minor leaguers, the Red Sox brass seemingly are going to let
Let’s take a deeper look at exactly how these two would help out the team this year. I think all can agree that both of these speedsters would certainly help the team out on the basepaths, where Coco was second on the team last year (to Julio Lugo) with 28 steals in 34 attempts, and Jacoby had a very respectable 9 steals out of 9 attempts in limited major league action, as well as 41 more in the minors. I’ll give the slight edge to Ellsbury in the running department.
Moving on next to offense, I think that this is where the questions will definitely arise. Will the Sox get the production they expected out of
The last aspect of the game we need to look at is defense, which is where
Another thing to consider, and probably one of the most important, is the intangibles of each player. For Ellsbury, would it hurt his development as a young player to sit on the bench for a season? Could he handle a pinch-running and defensive replacement role after being the star of his team coming up through high school, college, and the minors? I’m inclined to say yes to the first question and no to the second. It’s hard to dispute that Jacoby is a star on the rise, and a year on the bench could stunt his growth. But I think he would perform very well in a bench role, as he helped the Red Sox tremendously late in games last September and October. For Crisp, the big question is whether he would be happy in a platoon role or with limited playing time coming off the bench. He has already stated publicly that he would prefer to be traded than to not play at all for the Red Sox, which is understandable. I don’t see him becoming a problem to the team chemistry like Jay Payton was a couple years ago when he wasn’t getting the playing time he felt he deserved. Unless Coco is getting at least 3 starts a week, though, I think it would be best for all parties if they were able to trade him for some insurance starting pitching. The best scenario for the Red Sox would be to have one of the two clearly emerge in spring training as the better player. If that doesn’t happen, given all the factors above, I’d have to go with
In the end, having too many outfielders is clearly better than having too few for the Red Sox. They will be challenged by the Yankees, Indians, and Tigers this season, but will definitely be the team to beat coming out of Spring Training.
1 response so far ↓
1 Bobby Swift // Mar 12, 2008 at 4:32 pm
Very nice article…one thing you don’t mention is the importance of service time. If the Sox leave Ellsbury in the minors until around June 10th (I forget the exact date) and then call him up, this year plus his playing time last year wouldn’t amount to a year of service time…meaning the Sox would still have 6 full years of control over Ellsbury starting in 2009. So this should be a consideration for the Sox’ front office, because that could save them (potentially) millions of dollars down the road. Of course, if Ellsbury would add a win over Crisp during the first 2.5 months of the season, and this means the difference between making and missing the playoffs, that is worth millions of dollars *right now*. It’s a tough decision.
Leave a Comment