Imagine if you woke up tomorrow and found that Wikipedia has started charging an access fee. It would cause a meme-filled outpouring of indignation, provoking an immediate case of indigestion for any student trying to complete an essay, and probably ending in an attack by Anonymous. Underlying all the outrage would be one true and damning argument: most of Wikipedia’s content is generated by people that will not be paid for the published fruits of their labors. If Wikipedia claimed its role as a publisher allowed it to limit and profit from access to its crowd-sourced content, we would all cry foul.
So why do we allow the same travesty to continue in academic publishing? Research articles presenting new scientific findings are a far cry from crowd-sourced articles analyzing Snakes on a Plane. But information published in journals like Science and Nature is gathered by scientists who pay a fee to publish in these journals. These journals then send out manuscripts to be peer-reviewed – for free – by other scientists in the same field. These journals then charge for access to this information. It’s a brilliantly executed con sustained by the stranglehold these journals have on the ultimate currency in academia: prestige.
Outrage at this bullying might be limited to the scientists acting as workhorses for these journals, except that American tax dollars pay for 60% of basic academic research. Only 10% of academic articles are published in open access journals, which are freely available online. To access the remaining 90%, universities pay millions of dollars in subscription fees buying back information that is collected, reviewed, and edited by their own researchers. Taxpayers outside of universities that want to research their diagnosis of a rare disease, or investigate a new discovery in more depth, face a fee of $40 or more per article. Aaron Swartz, the much-lauded and mourned internet activist, called this limited access “private theft of public culture.”
This current model of academic publishing is robbing us of much more than direct access to information that we’ve paid for. Paywalls, while helping publishers profit, cause untold damage to research progress and innovation. Even among scholars at universities shelling out subscription fees, lack of access is still a serious problem. For example, a 2006 survey of microbiologists and immunologists revealed that over one-third still have difficulty accessing of all the articles they need. Even biotechnology companies, which are a critical link in translating basic research into useful medical and technological applications, are allowed only limited access to cutting-edge research by small subscription budgets.
If you don’t believe me, believe 52 Nobel laureates. In a letter supporting the Federal Research Public Access Act, they stated: “Broad dissemination of research results is fundamental to the advancement of knowledge. For America to obtain an optimal return on our investment in science, publicly funded research must be shared as broadly as possible.” The legislation ultimately faltered, but a new bill is shows more promise of success.
The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR) is making its way through the U.S. Senate. This legislation would mandate that all federal agencies with annual research and development budgets of $100 million or more to provide the public with free online access to the results of that research within 6 months of publication. The six main agencies affected by this legislation dole out 97% of federal research funds, effectively making FASTR’s an open-access gateway to all federally-funded research. The NIH has already successfully implemented this model with the central database PubMed, where anyone can access scientific and medical research within a year of its publication.
FASTR is a necessary first step in removing boundaries that block the exchange of ideas or stifle collaboration in scientific research. Previous versions of this bill have been defeated early in the legislative process. But a growing tide of resentment towards privileged information in research, coupled with the realization of the Internet’s potential in collaborative work, have given FASTR a better chance than previous attempts. Bring on the memes, bring on the outrage, and bring on the end of a system that treats basic truths as privileged commodities.
Sarah Douglas is PhD candidate at Harvard University in molecular biology.
ACT: If interested in spending 3 minutes to contact your local Senator about FASTR, get quick instructions here.
43 comments
RADA says:
Nov 2, 2020
Keep Up The Good Work.
Latest Jobs Today
Irshad says:
Nov 5, 2020
thank
Marino says:
Nov 6, 2020
That’s a big truth. In the end those who lose are the researchers who spend their lives researching and still pay to publish, in addition, their articles are sold. I tried to publish an article and a magazine charged almost $ 1500 for 7 images, as soon as they only charged for the images. There should be government agencies that facilitate publications.
Cursos e Promocoes
Buddy4Study says:
Nov 7, 2020
Thanks for sharing such a great information.. It really helpful to me..I always search to read the quality content and finally i found this in you post. keep it up!
OGYOUTUBE Apk says:
Nov 8, 2020
Thank you for sharing such a creative post as per your interest. It’s nice
Ashish kumar says:
Nov 9, 2020
wow really a nice article
Ashish kumar says:
Nov 9, 2020
nice article
PunjabStudyAdda:UPSC PCS NEET IBPS INSURANCE QUIZ MOCK TEST
muaxegiabeo says:
Nov 11, 2020
Thank you ! It’s very important
Enrique says:
Nov 13, 2020
I like this article
Visita informática Ávila
Typhoon TV Apk says:
Nov 20, 2020
Hi, very interesting post. This is really great stuff. Thank you for sharing
toyota vios 2021 says:
Nov 21, 2020
Thank you your sharing !
Melissa says:
Nov 22, 2020
Thanks for sharing.
Fortuner 2021 says:
Nov 23, 2020
Thank you your sharing !
Innova 2021 says:
Nov 24, 2020
Thank you your sharing !
Bis Matrimony says:
Nov 26, 2020
Awesome post! This is helpful post. This article is clear and with lots of useful information. Thanks for the run down!
Kerala Wedding says:
Nov 26, 2020
The rest makes perfect sense, but the biggest thing I learned was
to do it – whether or not everyone else does. You are appreciated!
toyota cross 2021 hybrid says:
Nov 26, 2020
Awesome post! This is helpful post. This article is clear and with lots of useful information. Thanks for the run down!
ban tai hilux 2021 says:
Nov 27, 2020
Hi, very interesting post. This is really great stuff. Thank you for sharing
vios 2020 says:
Nov 27, 2020
Wow, that’s what I was looking for, what a stuff! present here at this weblog,
thanks admin
toyota cross 2021 says:
Dec 1, 2020
Thank you so much for the content. Ninura feels help by this content. Ninura doesn’t believe this kind of article exist. Ninura hopes you keep updating such kind of article. Ninura promises will come back again to this site to check out for the latest update of your content. Once again, thanks for sharing.
toyota vios 2021 says:
Dec 3, 2020
Hi, very interesting post. This is really great stuff. Thank you for sharing
xe hyundai says:
Dec 6, 2020
Hi, very interesting post. This is really great stuff. Thank you for sharing
Accent 2021 says:
Dec 10, 2020
Hi, very interesting post. This is really great stuff. Thank you for sharing
Hyundai Grand i10 2021 says:
Dec 11, 2020
Hi, very interesting post. This is really great stuff. Thank you for sharing
elantra 2021 says:
Dec 12, 2020
Hi, very interesting post. This is really great stuff. Thank you for sharing
hyundai kona 2021 says:
Dec 13, 2020
oxybutynin verses toviaz
Contoh Surat says:
Dec 14, 2020
Nice Artikel Bro, and thanks for sharing. Contoh Surat
santafe 2021 says:
Dec 16, 2020
oxybutynin verses toviaz
hyundai solati 2021 says:
Dec 19, 2020
Nice one
Md Rajib says:
Dec 19, 2020
The policy article is infomative. thanks
Toilet Sink says:
Dec 19, 2020
Thanks
Celular 4.0 says:
Dec 21, 2020
very informative. Thanks you!
Dieta saude says:
Dec 21, 2020
Nice. Enjoyable reading.
Thanks for sharing.
Coração says:
Dec 21, 2020
In fact, unfortunately, we do not value works like wikipedia. They should have started with some fee. Today to read a scientific article you always have to pay. Good articles in the area of biology, which is my area, are always over fifty dollars. And, many times the authors of the articles still pay for them to be published.
visit shop says:
Dec 23, 2020
Good answer back in return of this issue with firm arguments and
explaining all regarding that.
accent 2021 says:
Dec 24, 2020
You are best in providing Links
hyundai says:
Dec 26, 2020
You are best in providing Links
https://www.mode-bresilienne.com/ says:
Dec 27, 2020
I do consider all the ideas you have offered
for your post. They are very convincing and will certainly work.
Still, the posts are too quick for beginners.
Could you please prolong them a bit from next time?
Thank you for the post.
Resumo says:
Dec 28, 2020
A great information.
Leather Boots says:
Jan 13, 2021
Thanks for sharing such a great information.I am really satisfied.
Pharma Jobs - Pharmry says:
Jan 18, 2021
very satisfying article, also read more for, 5 Career Options in Pharmaceutical Industry
5 Career Options in Pharmaceutical Industry
Manutenção celular says:
Jan 21, 2021
Very good.
gia xe accent says:
Jan 24, 2021
Nice Informative Blog having nice sharing