The Death
of Scholarship
Plundering our cultural and economic
patrimony
"The age of
chivalry is gone," famously lamented the great statesman Edmund Burke, "All the
super-added ideas furnished from the wardrobe of a moral imagination, which the
heart owns and the understanding ratifies as necessary to cover the defects of
our naked, shivering nature, and to raise it to dignity in our own estimation,
are to be exploded as a ridiculous, absurd, and antiquated fashion." Indeed,
the new General Education program presently being considered by the Faculty to
replace the moribund Core Curriculum, seems to aim at nothing less than tearing
down the "decent drapery of life," that one-time pearl of scholarly
institutions like Harvard, a truly Liberal Education.
In the stead of
classical learning, whose pillars were once the study of Greek, Latin, and
Hebrew and the Great Books of the West, we have before our eyes the semblance
of a politically-correct but thoroughly unedifying collection of
currently-ascendant academic fashions. Gone are the days when Harvard students
could have been expected to have studied Shakespeare and Vergil and to have
pondered Plato and Aristotle, when excellence and insight would have been not
only discerned but praised. In the contemporary academy, however, the only
virtues left to slake the soul of lethargic academics are the platitudes of
political correctness, of the primacy of "subaltern studies" or other cowardly
apologies for misidentified Western guilt. And it is not only we students who
must endure this educational regime, but the name of learning itself, that is
so cruelly and purposefully abused.
|
|
The Inhumanity of the Humanities Roger G. Waite '10 The Sophistry of Social Science The Manliness of Mansfield's Erudition Daniel J. Nadler G1
|
|
|
Features
|
Also This Issue
|
|
Up Front
|
|
Editor: Ryan M. McCaffrey '07
Publisher: Christopher B. Lacaria '09
Managing Editor: Adam D. Hilkemann '07
Copyright © 2007 The Harvard Salient, Inc.